The Tectonics of Learning – Regression and Progression
If you’ve never experienced an earthquake, take my word for it, they’re attention grabbers. One moment everything is calm, and the next moment usually without warning, the ground is shaking with a rumble like no other. Coming from California, I’ve experienced three major earthquakes in my lifetime, and countless aftershocks. Sometimes the damage is minor, a broken window, a fallen planter box, or even a short power outage. We native Californians tend to shrug those off; then there’s the other times…
Loma Prieta hit 5 days prior to my 14th birthday in 1989, and I still recall the events as though they were yesterday.
Working where I work, and doing what I do, it’s common to encounter families who are on the verge of experiencing their own little earthquake as they walk the fault lying between their two tectonic plates of life: Progression and Regression. The tend to tiptoe between survival mode and a blind hope of finding the “magic bullet” to solve their dilemma. Push too hard in one direction and they may slide backwards. Push too far forward, and they may fall flat in an attempt at progress.
There was a question posted recently on one of the Facebook pages I follow regarding what to do, or think, when a child starts Vision Therapy and within the first few weeks has a dip in academic performance. Since conventional wisdom surely would lead one in the direction of something positive after beginning Vision Therapy, the inference of the question is beyond fair when things go the other way. Is this good? Is this bad? Is this normal? Am I missing something? All are good points. But before we go there, consider this:
If someone were to ask you to identify the one aspect of an earthquake which makes it an earthquake, eventually we’d all reach the same one-word answer: movement. Alas, without movement, an earthquake is just…the ground. Movement is where earthquakes happen. Movement is what makes earthquakes scary, and violent, and nerve-racking, and destructive, and sadly it’s also what can make them so destructive. But the movement is the key ingredient.
The same can be said for learning…movement is key.
Learning is not a continuous forward motion; rather, it more resembles a sine graph. There’s peaks and valleys. There’s ebbs and flows. There’s ascents and descents. There’s no telling when, if ever, if will level off. If it’s nothing else, it’s never a static posture. Sure, maybe there’s days the fluctuations are more gradual or less gradual, but the fact remains that change is the only constant. And just like the sine graph, no matter which direction your parabola of learning begins there’s certainly no need to panic since it’s clear there’s an upswing on the horizon. Movement is movement, although understandably it may seem like an internal earthquake to the patient and their families, something is happening. Unlike an earthquake though, this movement is welcomed.
Stay tuned for Part 2.